sThe scientific journal Nature recently published an article titled “Chile Proposes a Constitution Imbued with Science,” whose author, Rodriguez Maga, systematically analyzes the references on science and other scientific topics contained in the new constitution that will be put to a referendum on September 4. In this scholarly article, the author outlines articles and constitutional rules relating to science, technology, nature, climate change, the environment, and scientific research in Chile. Besides the above, he asserts that from a global perspective, the constitutional proposal: “contains a series of articles aimed at strengthening science, expanding environmental protection, and improving the national education system.” Along with this first positive approach to the constitutional proposal, the author analyzes both favorable and divergent views on the above-mentioned constitutional parameters which are seen as conducive to the development of science, ecological balance and sustainable development of our country. This publication not only demonstrates a positive acceptance of the constitutional proposition in the scientific world, but essentially allows us to acknowledge that the world is watching with interest and interest the process that will define a new constitution for Chile. For those of us who have followed the constitutional process and the deep democratic debate that gave life to the 388 articles voted overwhelmingly at the Constitutional Convention, it does not surprise us that issues such as social rights, indigenous peoples’ rights, and the rights of the nature and role of science, among other citizen issues, are part of the new constitution, since it includes those areas in which the Chileans, especially the young, have comforted and given such outstanding value in the election of the traditional majority. It was obtained by representatives of the social, cultural, ecological, feminine and academic world, mostly lawyers, professors and representatives of these concepts.world ions. This was expressed, for example, in the Committee on Knowledge Systems, Cultures, Science, Technology, Arts and Heritage, which, besides interpreting the times in which we live, the environmental, social and environmental concerns, especially of new generations, contributed to the debate by sharing a number Countless scholars have requested public hearings to present their suggestions regarding how science will be reflected in the new constitution. Among the traditional scholars with national and international relevance who contributed their experience and knowledge to the constitutional proposal are Cristina Doradador Traditional (Doctor of Natural Sciences, Male Microbiology) and Doctor of Education, Academician Carlos Calvo, among others and other traditional products from some of the major research centers in the country and its regions. From this assessment of the role of science in national and local development, Cristina Dorador asserts: “The new constitution prepares us for the future, a constitution for the twenty-first century that speaks to the climate crisis, digital rights, science and technology, to heritage issues, and to leave a better country for future generations.” Recognizing one of the most relevant scholarly publications in the world for the efforts and commitment of traditional publications to integrate all forms of knowledge and knowledge that allow for a balanced, sustainable and equitable development in the new constitution, is an invitation to consider a text in a hopeful way with a positive vision of the future, only in this way can we reveal its meaning Etymological (removing or withdrawing the veil) the prejudices and prejudices that obscure the deep meaning of the text created and built into the framework of the deepest and broadest democratic dialogue that has our recent history and is based on various sources and forms of building and developing knowledge.
penguin media This provides a space for the audience to personally express opinions and comments, appeal to respect among users and completely separate themselves from the content of outgoing comments.
“Award-winning zombie scholar. Music practitioner. Food expert. Troublemaker.”